logo

All content copyrighted and may not be republished without permission.                                                                                                                                                           

 

 

Lee E. Meadows, PhD.

Professor of Management –Walsh College

Authored: Silent Conspiracy & Silent Suspicion

LeMeadows@comcast.net

 

Necessary meetings should be kept short, to the point

 

Is this meeting REALLY necessary? Given the current state of rapid internal change being thrust upon business organizations, this probably looms as one of the most important business productivity questions currently begging for a definitive answer.

I had the rare opportunity to be on a three-way phone conference with two of my sisters.

 

As noticeable twins, their careers have had similar hurdles while moving along parallel paths. Both are committed long standing employees of their chosen organizations, though one chose manufacturing and the other chose government service, and find themselves survivors of the most recent wave of downsizing and restructuring efforts. During the course of my listening to the dialogue (we hadn’t reached a point where my input was required), it became evident that a common frustration had emerged despite the difference in their organizations and the geography that separates their interaction (Southeast USA and Eastern Europe).

 

My sisters were both overwhelmed at the growth in number of meetings they were told to attend and/or facilitate. As mid-level managers, they were increasingly concerned that meetings were starting to dominate the way in which they went about their day-to-day managerial activities. My moment for input arrived when in that mysterious way twins communicate, both said, “and it’s such a waste of (shareholders/taxpayers) money.” I burrowed through the brief lapse in conversation and said, “Perhaps I can offer something useful.” Ignoring the “Is this an offer we can’t refuse?” comment of geographically safe sister in Europe, I commented how their mutual frustration is actually more widespread than is generally known.

 

A research article entitled Meetings in America: A study of trends, costs and attitudes toward business travel, teleconferencing, and their impact on productivity, managers attend an average of 61.8 meetings per month, over 11 million meetings occurs in the U.S. everyday, over 50 percent of this meeting time is wasted. This translates into about 31 hours per month or 4 days of wasted time better spent doing something productive. Now, if the average meeting lasts about an hour and thirty minutes of it is wasted, then the millions of dollars lost due to unproductive meeting time on an annual basis by organizations in general is, at the very least, at the appalling level.

 

Some of the reasons why meetings are unproductive include, but are not limited to, daydreaming, bringing other work to the meeting, dozing off, arriving late or not at all, digressing from the topic or no clarity around the topic. As a rule, meetings rarely have a positive reputation and when compounded with the increase in individual workload, the reputation suffers tenfold when the number of meetings increases and the resulting inefficiencies that follow. “For what it’s worth,” I said to both of them, “My observation of this process is that most people don’t know how to run an effective meeting.” I rode the silent moment until my sister in the Southeast said, “So, tell us, grasshopper, what makes for an effective meeting?”

 

I started with the basics:

 

  • Have a clear purpose: Why is the meeting being held? Remember that people have plenty of other purposeful things to do.

 

  • Have an agenda: Emphasize agenda items by starting with the most important to the least important. Also, indicate if the item is for discussion, information or a decision.

 

  • Have a timeline: Committed to actually being in a meeting is reinforced if the meeting starts and ends on time. Also, if 50 percent of the time used in an hour meeting is wasted, perhaps the meeting itself should only be 30 minutes.

 

  • Have a process: Make sure that digressions, tangents, ramblings and other misdirected behavior have a clear shut off valve.

 

  • Have the right people in attendance: The only relevant people at the meeting should only be those who can contribute what no one else can. This also includes those who only have two- five minutes of a contribution. They rarely mind being asked to attend and leave before the meeting is over.

 

It has become unmistakably clear that the skill to manage a meeting is a critical asset to career progression and the only way to achieve this skill is through training and practice.

I reminded my sisters that as managers in their respective organizations, they are entrusted with the responsibility to make proper use of the organizations resources in achieving stated outcomes. Two of the organizations crucial resources are its time and its people thereby making it essential that managers understand that the power to call meeting is just a critical to the effectiveness of an organization as the power to not call a meeting.

 

The conversation ended with us agreeing to discuss the issue at a later time, but not before scheduling a meeting.